[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <113066935.nniJfEyVGO@diego>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:48:28 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, conor@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
guoren@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] RISC-V: resort all extensions in consistent orders
Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2022, 00:41:25 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> Ordering between each and every list of extensions is wildly
> inconsistent. Per discussion on the lists pick the following policy:
>
> - The array defining order in /proc/cpuinfo follows a narrow
> interpretation of the ISA specifications, described in a comment
> immediately presiding it.
>
> - All other lists of extensions are sorted alphabetically.
>
> This will hopefully allow for easier review & future additions, and
> reduce conflicts between patchsets as the number of extensions grows.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221129144742.2935581-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com/
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists