[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29de4d2b-3e32-809e-6ccd-5e7a4fe548fc@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:38:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Saravanan Sekar <saravanan@...umiz.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
marten.lindahl@...s.com, jdelvare@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: hwmon/pmbus: Add mps,mpq7932
power-management IC
On 01/12/2022 12:29, Saravanan Sekar wrote:
> On 01/12/22 11:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/12/2022 05:46, Saravanan Sekar wrote:
>>> Document mpq7932 power-management IC
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Saravanan Sekar <saravanan@...umiz.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
>> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
>> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
>> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks for your time to review and feedback.
>
> Here are the summary of comments on V1, I have fixed all according to my
> understanding.
>
>
> 1. Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (git log --oneline -- ...).
>
> git log --oneline -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/
> 1ccca53618c4 dt-bindings: hwmon/pmbus: Add mps,mpq7932 power-management IC
> 373c0a77934c dt-bindings: hwmon/pmbus: Add ti,lm25066 power-management IC
> 7f464532b05d dt-bindings: Add missing 'additionalProperties: false'
> 8a36e38d8b0f dt-bindings: hwmon/pmbus: Add ti,ucd90320 power sequencer
>
> I have used the same format of 373c0a77934c.
>
> 2. Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make
> dt_binding_check` (see
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).
>
> I did run dt_binding_check on V1 but failed to notice warnings. Fixed
> warning on V2 and didn't observed any warnings.
>
> 3. Why requiring nodename? Device schemas usually don't do that.
> dropped "pattern: "pmic@[0-9a-f]{1,2}""
>
> 4. regulators node is a regulator with one more regulator? Drop.
> dropped "$ref: regulator.yaml# "
The comment was - drop entire regulators node.
Plus additional comment for the driver (and related to bindings) was
that this is not hwmon but a regulator driver. Why putting regulator
driver in hwmon?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists