linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] container_of: add container_of_const() that preserves const-ness of the pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4npGz+qwqv3xtBi@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2022 14:01:31 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] container_of: add container_of_const() that
 preserves const-ness of the pointer

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 11:45:55AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:21:50PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 08:30:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > container_of does not preserve the const-ness of a pointer that is
> > > passed into it, which can cause C code that passes in a const pointer to
> > > get a pointer back that is not const and then scribble all over the data
> > > in it.  To prevent this, container_of_const() will preserve the const
> > > status of the pointer passed into it using the newly available _Generic()
> > > method.
> > 
> > "_const" in the name suggests that the macro would always take a const
> > argument.
> 
> I mean it here to be "this will preserve const" as yes, it can take a
> const.  Or not.
> 
> > Could this be called e.g. container_of_safe() (for type-safe, but
> > full type_safe would be a bit long)?
> 
> const is an attribute of type safety, container_of is also type-safe
> as-is, it's just the const portion here that is the difference between
> the two.

container_of_const_safe() :-)

> Naming is hard :(

True.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko