[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4nx/HMggCOhdIMy@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:39:24 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: mlevitsk@...hat.com, samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org,
pawell@...ence.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/162] 5.10.157-rc1 review
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:49:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [If I cc-ed you, you are author of one of patches below. Please take a
> look.]
>
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:05:05 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> I hope to make it :-). I
>
> > Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>
> > usb: cdnsp: Device side header file for CDNSP driver
> >
> > Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>
> > usb: cdns3: Add support for DRD CDNSP
>
> These two together are 1500+ lines, and are marked as Stable-dep-of:
> 9d5333c93134 ("usb: cdns3: host: fix endless superspeed hub port
> reset") . But we don't have that one in 5.10 tree. Likely we should
> not have these either.
I already dropped these yesterday.
> > Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> > KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after rsm
>
> No. The patch does not do anything. Mainline commit this referenced
> changed the return value, this changes just a comment. Wrong backport?
I will look at this.
> > Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
> > speakup: Generate speakupmap.h automatically
>
> Ok, so this one rewrites some header generation and is buggy. 500+ lines.
Already dropped yesterday.
> > Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@...il.com>
> > speakup: replace utils' u_char with unsigned char
>
> With this patch fixing it. The rewrite is marked as stable depedncency
> of the fix, but fix would not be needed if we did not apply the
> rewrite. We should not have these two in stable.
Again, already dropped.
thanks for the review.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists