linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/162] 5.10.157-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4nyX9/clyX0P3f8@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:41:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     mlevitsk@...hat.com, samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org,
        pawell@...ence.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/162] 5.10.157-rc1 review

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 01:39:24PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:49:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > [If I cc-ed you, you are author of one of patches below. Please take a
> > look.]
> > 
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:05:05 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > I hope to make it :-). I
> > 
> > > Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>
> > >     usb: cdnsp: Device side header file for CDNSP driver
> > > 
> > > Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>
> > >     usb: cdns3: Add support for DRD CDNSP
> > 
> > These two together are 1500+ lines, and are marked as Stable-dep-of:
> > 9d5333c93134 ("usb: cdns3: host: fix endless superspeed hub port
> > reset") . But we don't have that one in 5.10 tree. Likely we should
> > not have these either.
> 
> I already dropped these yesterday.
> 
> > > Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> > >     KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after rsm
> > 
> > No. The patch does not do anything. Mainline commit this referenced
> > changed the return value, this changes just a comment. Wrong backport?
> 
> I will look at this.

Yeah, something went wrong with the backport, I'll drop this.  Sasha,
can you add this back to your queue?

thanks,

greg k-h