[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62ee3765-b4fc-db79-5281-7295e43f4314@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:02:11 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
To: yang.yang29@....com.cn, geert@...ux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xu.panda@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] m68k: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()
Hi Xu,
On 3/12/22 16:10, yang.yang29@....com.cn wrote:
> From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
>
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com>
Thanks. Seeing as this is non-MMU related I'll take this through
the m68knommu git tree. Applied to the for-next branch.
Regards
Greg
> ---
> arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
> index cb6def585851..37fb663559b4 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
> +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> config_BSP(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM)
> - strncpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
> - command_line[sizeof(command_line) - 1] = 0;
> + strscpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
> #endif /* CONFIG_BOOTPARAM */
>
> process_uboot_commandline(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists