linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add compatible for SM8550

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:16:23 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add compatible for SM8550

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:43:26PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/11/2022 12:31, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Document the compatible for SM8550.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> 
> Why this is not part of other SoC patches? I just received many single
> patches for this SM8550 topic. All these should be set of few series,
> not 10 or more...
> 

Because these patches are independent of each other and done in this way
means the maintainer can merge each piece on its own. I much prefer this
over having these series with 20+ patches being sent over and over
because one of the patches is getting feedback.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>