linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add compatible for SM8550

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b012d945-f3f1-c9d1-09dc-c721346cb922@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:43:31 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add compatible for SM8550

On 05/12/2022 22:16, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:43:26PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/11/2022 12:31, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>> Document the compatible for SM8550.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
>>
>> Why this is not part of other SoC patches? I just received many single
>> patches for this SM8550 topic. All these should be set of few series,
>> not 10 or more...
>>
> 
> Because these patches are independent of each other and done in this way
> means the maintainer can merge each piece on its own. I much prefer this
> over having these series with 20+ patches being sent over and over
> because one of the patches is getting feedback.

But this one is patch for you, so should go with other patches targeting
Qualcomm subarch. Before submission, we discussed extensively the
proposed split per patches and it was agreed on. Yet this one here was a
surprise.

Best regards,
Krzysztof