linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] HID: uclogic: Add HID_QUIRK_HIDINPUT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1dc9d0ba-4836-dfc6-8bf2-322ce3b5c24d@alexyzhang.dev>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:49:10 -0800
From:   Alexander Zhang <alex@...xyzhang.dev>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
        benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, openglfreak@...glemail.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] HID: uclogic: Add HID_QUIRK_HIDINPUT_FORCE quirk

Hello,

On 11/19/22 11:01 PM, Alexander Zhang wrote:
> On 11/14/22 6:10 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Alexander Zhang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi José,
>>>
>>> On 11/10/22 9:40 AM, José Expósito wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> About 3 months ago, Torge Matthies sent a patch fixing an issue with
>>>> his XP-Pen Star G640 [1].
>>>>
>>>> His patch changes the IS_INPUT_APPLICATION() macro to accept
>>>> HID_DG_DIGITIZER. However, it looks like it is not being merged because
>>>> of the possible side effects that changing that macro could generate.
>>>>
>>>> This patch aims to fix the same issue but using a more conservative
>>>> approach hoping that the bug can be fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Torge, Alexander, could you test it and confirm that it fixes your
>>>> issues, please?
>>>
>>> I tested the patch on commit 4bbf3422df78 and it fixes the issue.
>>
>> I will add
>>
>>     Tested-by: Alexander Zhang <alex@...xyzhang.dev>
>>
>> to the commit; please speak up if you disagree.
> 
> I'm not sure if you're still waiting for a response from me but I'm fine 
> with that.

Is there something preventing this patch from being merged? I'm not very 
familiar with the kernel development process.

Best,
Alexander Zhang