Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtR6RV8YkWe+QkLyFkNegLJgVHZafTAH8AnQyUcCnT_7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:33:56 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/124] 6.0.12-rc1 review

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 00:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.12 release.
> There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:07:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.0.12-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.0.y
* git commit: cdf2cb62aec478b66cd531a340a5e3b58a782252
* git describe: v6.0.11-125-gcdf2cb62aec4
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.0.y/build/v6.0.11-125-gcdf2cb62aec4

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.0.11)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.0.11)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.0.11)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.0.11)

## Test result summary
total: 137036, pass: 120940, fail: 3015, skip: 12818, xfail: 263

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 147 total, 144 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 34 passed, 1 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-timens
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ip
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists