[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d75ca7a3de87fb211a216de169e4394e79a82a7d.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:19:58 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH 0/2] feat: checkpatch: prohibit Buglink: and warn
about missing Link:
On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 17:02 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 13:14 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 12:33:37 +0100
> > From: Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>
[]
> > - checkpatch implements custum versions of Perl core modules, that might
> > be an future area for clean-ups? Eg. right off the bat there is a
> > `uniq` implementation. List::Util (core module since 5.8.0 (5.7.3 to
> > be pedantic)) has a far better performing version in XS.
> Maybe. I don't know there are that many generic functions
> that could be used. You are welcome find some.
uniq isn't used in checkpatch since
commit 52178ce01335d9d76611c3a5198b8778cb9b03f5
Author: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Date: Fri Feb 26 15:08:26 2021 +0530
checkpatch: add verbose mode
and could be removed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists