[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y49sIRZ1y6wq884J@x1n>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 11:21:53 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ives van Hoorne <ives@...esandbox.io>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/uffd: Always wr-protect pte in pte_mkuffd_wp()
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:46:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> vim +316 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
>
> 313
> 314 static inline pte_t pte_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte)
> 315 {
> > 316 return pte_wrprotect(pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_UFFD_WP));
> 317 }
It's interesting to know the bot will test any patch I attach in an mail
reply, which is very nice...
I'll send a formal patch for this one soon.
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists