linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] dt-bindings: spi: mtk-snfi: Add read latch latency property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:00:17 +0000
From:   Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜) 
        <Xiangsheng.Hou@...iatek.com>
To:     "miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "gch981213@...il.com" <gch981213@...il.com>,
        "vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
        "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com" 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        "richard@....at" <richard@....at>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benliang Zhao (赵本亮) 
        <Benliang.Zhao@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Bin Zhang (章斌) <bin.zhang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] dt-bindings: spi: mtk-snfi: Add read latch latency
 property

Hi Angelo,

On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 13:19 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-
> > > > mtk-snfi.yaml
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-
> > > > mtk-snfi.yaml
> > > > index bab23f1b11fd..6e6ff8d73fcd 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
> > > > snfi.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
> > > > snfi.yaml
> > > > @@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ properties:
> > > >        description: device-tree node of the accompanying ECC
> > > > engine.
> > > >        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > > >    
> > > > +  mediatek,rx-latch-latency:
> > > > +    description: Rx delay to sample data with this value, the
> > > > value
> > > > +                 unit is clock cycle.
> > > 
> > > Can't we use nanoseconds or microseconds as a unit here, instead
> > > of
> > > clock cycles?
> > 
> > The clock cycle will be various with MediaTek SPI NAND controller
> > which
> > clock frequency can support 26/52/68/81/104MHz...
> > It`s may be easy to configure and understand with clock cycle in
> > unit.
> > 
> 
> Yes, but whatever clock frequency we use, the target is to always
> wait for
> X nanoseconds, right?
> 
> Waiting for 5 clock cycles at 104MHz is obviously not the same as
> waiting
> for the same 5 clock cycles at 26MHz: in that case, expressing the
> value
> in nanoseconds or microseconds would make that independent from the
> controller's clock frequency as the calculation from `time` to
> `cycles`
> would be performed inside of the driver.

There have two rx related timing properties in spi-peripheral-props.
The rx-sample-delay-ns have been used in Mediatek snfi driver to adjust
controller sample delay.
However another spi-rx-delay-us is in microseconds. Take 52MHz for
example, the clock cycle will be 19.23ns which lower than 1us. This may
not easy to by one clock cycle.

Thanks
Xiangsheng Hou