[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2ccf42f94152ccacad3a2eaec234ae0566474ec.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:00:17 +0000
From: Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜)
<Xiangsheng.Hou@...iatek.com>
To: "miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"gch981213@...il.com" <gch981213@...il.com>,
"vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Benliang Zhao (赵本亮)
<Benliang.Zhao@...iatek.com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bin Zhang (章斌) <bin.zhang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] dt-bindings: spi: mtk-snfi: Add read latch latency
property
Hi Angelo,
On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 13:19 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-
> > > > mtk-snfi.yaml
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-
> > > > mtk-snfi.yaml
> > > > index bab23f1b11fd..6e6ff8d73fcd 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
> > > > snfi.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
> > > > snfi.yaml
> > > > @@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ properties:
> > > > description: device-tree node of the accompanying ECC
> > > > engine.
> > > > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > > >
> > > > + mediatek,rx-latch-latency:
> > > > + description: Rx delay to sample data with this value, the
> > > > value
> > > > + unit is clock cycle.
> > >
> > > Can't we use nanoseconds or microseconds as a unit here, instead
> > > of
> > > clock cycles?
> >
> > The clock cycle will be various with MediaTek SPI NAND controller
> > which
> > clock frequency can support 26/52/68/81/104MHz...
> > It`s may be easy to configure and understand with clock cycle in
> > unit.
> >
>
> Yes, but whatever clock frequency we use, the target is to always
> wait for
> X nanoseconds, right?
>
> Waiting for 5 clock cycles at 104MHz is obviously not the same as
> waiting
> for the same 5 clock cycles at 26MHz: in that case, expressing the
> value
> in nanoseconds or microseconds would make that independent from the
> controller's clock frequency as the calculation from `time` to
> `cycles`
> would be performed inside of the driver.
There have two rx related timing properties in spi-peripheral-props.
The rx-sample-delay-ns have been used in Mediatek snfi driver to adjust
controller sample delay.
However another spi-rx-delay-us is in microseconds. Take 52MHz for
example, the clock cycle will be 19.23ns which lower than 1us. This may
not easy to by one clock cycle.
Thanks
Xiangsheng Hou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists