[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e45a93d-56fd-b18e-de61-51ceccfee8a3@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:56:12 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
carsten.haitzler@....com, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sandipan.das@....com,
ananth.narayan@....com, santosh.shukla@....com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] perf test: Add event group test
Hi Athira,
>> +static int setup_uncore_event(void)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_pmu *pmu;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (list_empty(&pmus))
>> + perf_pmu__scan(NULL);
>> +
>> + perf_pmus__for_each_pmu(pmu) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < NR_UNCORE_PMUS; i++) {
>> + if (!strcmp(uncore_pmus[i].name, pmu->name)) {
>> + pr_debug("Using %s for uncore pmu event\n", pmu->name);
>> + types[2] = pmu->type;
>> + configs[2] = uncore_pmus[i].config;
>
> Hi Ravi,
>
> Observed failure while running the test on powerpc. It is because the uncore PMU ie hv_24x7 needs
> performance monitoring to be enabled in powerpc. So to handle such cases, can we add an “event_open" check before
> proceeding with the test. Below is the change on top of “tmp.perf/core” .
>
>
> From 8b33fb900c26beafc28f75b6f64631f8fdd045c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:17:25 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Update event group check for support of uncore
> event
>
> Event group test checks group creation for combinations of
> hw, sw and uncore PMU events. Some of the uncore pmu event
> requires performance enablement explicitly.
You need to open an event to activate hv_24x7 pmu?
> Example, hv_24x7
> event in powerpc. Hence add a check to see if event_open
> succeeds before proceeding.
>
> Fixes: 5c88101b797d ("perf test: Add event group test for events in multiple PMUs")
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c b/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c
> index 612c0444aaa8..ad52e1da259a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int event_open(int type, unsigned long config, int group_fd)
> static int setup_uncore_event(void)
> {
> struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> - int i;
> + int i, fd;
>
> if (list_empty(&pmus))
> perf_pmu__scan(NULL);
> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ static int setup_uncore_event(void)
> pr_debug("Using %s for uncore pmu event\n", pmu->name);
> types[2] = pmu->type;
> configs[2] = uncore_pmus[i].config;
Sure. Just add a comment here to explain why are we opening a
standalone event here.
> + fd = event_open(types[2], configs[2], -1);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return -1;
> + close(fd);
> return 0;
> }
> }
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists