[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13a7ac60-c9a2-aa60-f8ba-640d9e99ab44@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:13:32 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@...sung.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, pankaj.dubey@...sung.com,
ravi.patel@...sung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add
dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynosautov9
On 07/12/2022 09:58, Sriranjani P wrote:
> Exynosautov9 has several different SYSREGs, so use dedicated compatibles
> for them and deprecate usage of generic Exynosautov9 compatible alone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@...sung.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-sysreg.yaml | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-sysreg.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-sysreg.yaml
> index f57bc7c194a1..b6105d261b47 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-sysreg.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos-sysreg.yaml
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ properties:
> - samsung,exynos3-sysreg
> - samsung,exynos4-sysreg
> - samsung,exynos5-sysreg
> - - samsung,exynosautov9-sysreg
> - tesla,fsd-cam-sysreg
> - tesla,fsd-fsys0-sysreg
> - tesla,fsd-fsys1-sysreg
> @@ -45,6 +44,17 @@ properties:
> - const: samsung,exynos850-sysreg
> - const: syscon
> deprecated: true
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - samsung,exynosautov9-fsys2-sysreg
> + - samsung,exynosautov9-peric0-sysreg
> + - samsung,exynosautov9-peric1-sysreg
> + - const: samsung,exynosautov9-sysreg
> + - const: syscon
> + - items:
> + - const: samsung,exynosautov9-sysreg
> + - const: syscon
Same comment here - let's make it part of enums which are deprecated (so
together with 5433 and 850)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists