[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mt7yw6eh.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:12:38 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: guoren@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, guoren@...nel.org,
palmer@...osinc.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
luto@...nel.org, conor.dooley@...rochip.com, heiko@...ech.de,
jszhang@...nel.org, lazyparser@...il.com, falcon@...ylab.org,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
atishp@...shpatra.org, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, mark.rutland@....com,
zouyipeng@...wei.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
David.Laight@...lab.com, chenzhongjin@...wei.com,
greentime.hu@...ive.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com, ben@...adent.org.uk
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V10 10/10] riscv: stack: Add config of thread
stack size
guoren@...nel.org writes:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> 0cac21b02ba5 ("risc v: use 16KB kernel stack on 64-bit") increase the
checkpatch complains here: Use "commit SHA...".
> thread size mandatory, but some scenarios, such as D1 with a small
> memory footprint, would suffer from that. After independent irq stack
> support, let's give users a choice to determine their custom stack size.
...and again, my "why is this in the generic entry" series rant. :-)
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists