[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5HXWk4d5J9VgFBV@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:23:54 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] mfd: max597x: Add support for MAX5970 and MAX5978
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>
>
> On 17-11-2022 03:45 pm, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2022, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> >
> > > From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> > >
> > > Implement a regulator driver with IRQ support for fault management.
> > > Written against documentation [1] and [2] and tested on real hardware.
> > >
> > > Every channel has its own regulator supplies nammed 'vss1-supply' and
> > > 'vss2-supply'. The regulator supply is used to determine the output
> > > voltage, as the smart switch provides no output regulation.
> > > The driver requires the 'shunt-resistor-micro-ohms' property to be
> > > present in Device Tree to properly calculate current related
> > > values.
> > >
> > > Datasheet links:
> > > 1: https://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/MAX5970.pdf
> > > 2: https://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/MAX5978.pdf
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
> > > Co-developed-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 +++++
> > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/mfd/max597x.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mfd/max597x.h | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 207 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/max597x.c
> > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/max597x.h
> >
> > Ignoring my comments won't make them go away. :)
> >
> > Please tell me why you need a whole new driver, instead of adding
> > support to simple-mfd-i2c?
> >
> I felt current implementation to be simpler, clearer & straight forward.
If you can make it work with simple-mfd-i2c, please do so.
No need to submit an entirely new driver for these simple use-cases.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists