[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5HYzzwdWCrpWOTv@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:30:07 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: qcom_rpm: Fix an error handling path in
qcom_rpm_probe()
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If an error occurs after the clk_prepare_enable() call, a corresponding
> clk_disable_unprepare() should be called.
>
> Simplify code and switch to devm_clk_get_enabled() to fix it.
>
> Fixes: 3526403353c2 ("mfd: qcom_rpm: Handle message RAM clock")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> This changes the order of the clean-ups if the .remove() function is called
> but it looks fine to me.
> ---
> drivers/mfd/qcom_rpm.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Something funny going on here.
I received 3 identical versions of the same patch.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists