lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27ab1e71-6fdb-af0d-7dd1-a7731c1e2e95@microchip.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2022 15:17:25 +0000
From:   <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC:     <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: at91: do not compile dt-compat.c for sama7g5 and
 sam9x60

On 08.12.2022 16:39, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 08/12/2022 13:45:15+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> There is no need to have dt-compat.c compiled for SAMA7G5 and SAM9X60
>> as there is no in kernel device tree that could use it. Thus avoid
>> compiling dt-compat.c for them.
>>
> 
> Isn't it time to drop dt-compat.c? 

My assumption was that we need to guarantee that old device trees will
still work with newer kernels. Should we guarantee this only for a limited
period of time?

> I was going to send a patch after 6.1
> is released
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/at91/Makefile | 16 ++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile b/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile
>> index 79301e1c1c36..89061b85e7d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>  # Makefile for at91 specific clk
>>  #
>>
>> -obj-y += pmc.o sckc.o dt-compat.o
>> +obj-y += pmc.o sckc.o
>>  obj-y += clk-slow.o clk-main.o clk-pll.o clk-plldiv.o clk-master.o
>>  obj-y += clk-system.o clk-peripheral.o clk-programmable.o
>>
>> @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91_H32MX)             += clk-h32mx.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91_GENERATED_CLK)        += clk-generated.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91_I2S_MUX_CLK)  += clk-i2s-mux.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91_SAM9X60_PLL)  += clk-sam9x60-pll.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91RM9200) += at91rm9200.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9) += at91sam9260.o at91sam9rl.o at91sam9x5.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9) += at91sam9g45.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9) += at91sam9n12.o at91sam9x5.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91RM9200) += at91rm9200.o dt-compat.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9) += at91sam9260.o at91sam9rl.o at91sam9x5.o dt-compat.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9) += at91sam9g45.o dt-compat.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9) += at91sam9n12.o at91sam9x5.o dt-compat.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAM9X60) += sam9x60.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D3) += sama5d3.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D4) += sama5d4.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D2) += sama5d2.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D3) += sama5d3.o dt-compat.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D4) += sama5d4.o dt-compat.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D2) += sama5d2.o dt-compat.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA7G5) += sama7g5.o
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ