lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6dfaaee-405a-d576-d46d-0ec78f216f85@acm.org>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:28:41 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
        Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@....com>,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc:     beanhuo@...ron.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] ufs: core: Remove redundant wb check

On 12/8/22 04:22, Bean Huo wrote:
> 
> On 08.12.22 12:31 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 11/27/22 04:08, Arthur Simchaev wrote:
>>> We used to use the extended-feature field in the device descriptor,
>>> as an indication that the device supports ufs2.2 or later.
>>> Remove that as this check is specifically done few lines above.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@....com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 4 ----
>>>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>>> index 2dbe249..2e47c69 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>>> @@ -7608,10 +7608,6 @@ static void ufshcd_wb_probe(struct ufs_hba 
>>> *hba, const u8 *desc_buf)
>>>            (hba->dev_quirks & 
>>> UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_SUPPORT_EXTENDED_FEATURES)))
>>>           goto wb_disabled;
>>>   -    if (hba->desc_size[QUERY_DESC_IDN_DEVICE] <
>>> -        DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP + 4)
>>> -        goto wb_disabled;
>>> -
>>>       ext_ufs_feature = get_unaligned_be32(desc_buf +
>>>                       DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP);
>>
>> Does this code really have to be removed? I see a check of the
>> UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_SUPPORT_EXTENDED_FEATURES flag above the removed
>> code but no check of the descriptor size?
>>
> it is not necessary to check this, but if you have concern, we could 
> change to like this:
> 
> 
>          if (desc_buf[DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_LEN] <
>              DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP + 4)
>                  goto wb_disabled;
> 
> then   hba->desc_size could be removed.

Hi Bean,

My only concern is that this patch conflicts with the pending MCQ patch 
series. Since that conflict is unavoidable, let's keep this patch.

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ