[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15cb7a77-4308-15f0-4669-7a2673b4abcb@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:06:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2:
'depends-on' is no more optional
On 08/12/2022 16:51, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 10:46:32 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/12/2022 10:05, Herve Codina wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:26:41 +0100
>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/12/2022 17:24, Herve Codina wrote:
>>>>> The 'depends-on' property is set in involved DTS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Move it to a required property.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/renesas,pci-rcar-gen2.yaml | 1 +
>>>>
>>>> This should be squashed with previous patch. There is no point to add
>>>> property and immediately in the next patch make it required. Remember
>>>> that bindings are separate from DTS.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>
>>> I though about make dtbs_check in case of git bisect.
>>
>> And what would this commit change? In Git you will have
>> 1. dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2: Add depends-on for RZ/N1 SoC
>> family
>> 2. dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2: 'depends-on' is no more optional
>>
>> so what is the difference for git bisect?
>
> Well, today, I have:
> 1. dt-bindings: Add depends-on
> 2. dts: Add depends-on
> 3. dt-bindings: Move depends-on to mandatory
What does it mean "I have"? Patches on mailing list? But we talk about
Git and I wrote you bindings are DTS are not going the same tree.
>
> If I squash dt-bindings commits, I am going to have:
> 1. dt-bindings: Add mandatory depends-on
> 2. dts: Add depends-on
> or
> 1. dts: Add depends-on
> 2. dt-bindings: Add mandatory depends-on
And how does it matter? Anyway it goes separate trees.
>
> I have not tested but if I used only the first commit in each
> case (git bisect):
It's not bisectable anyway, you cannot make it bisectable within one
release.
> In the first case, dtbs_check is probably going to signal the
> missing 'depends-on' property on dts.
> In the second case, dtbs_check is probably going to signal the
> not described 'depends-on' property present in dts.
And why is that even a problem?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists