[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221213142258.77767caf@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:22:58 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2:
'depends-on' is no more optional
Hi Krzysztof,
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:06:55 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 08/12/2022 16:51, Herve Codina wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 10:46:32 +0100
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/12/2022 10:05, Herve Codina wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:26:41 +0100
> >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 07/12/2022 17:24, Herve Codina wrote:
> >>>>> The 'depends-on' property is set in involved DTS.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Move it to a required property.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/renesas,pci-rcar-gen2.yaml | 1 +
> >>>>
> >>>> This should be squashed with previous patch. There is no point to add
> >>>> property and immediately in the next patch make it required. Remember
> >>>> that bindings are separate from DTS.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Krzysztof
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I though about make dtbs_check in case of git bisect.
> >>
> >> And what would this commit change? In Git you will have
> >> 1. dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2: Add depends-on for RZ/N1 SoC
> >> family
> >> 2. dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2: 'depends-on' is no more optional
> >>
> >> so what is the difference for git bisect?
> >
> > Well, today, I have:
> > 1. dt-bindings: Add depends-on
> > 2. dts: Add depends-on
> > 3. dt-bindings: Move depends-on to mandatory
>
> What does it mean "I have"? Patches on mailing list? But we talk about
> Git and I wrote you bindings are DTS are not going the same tree.
>
> >
> > If I squash dt-bindings commits, I am going to have:
> > 1. dt-bindings: Add mandatory depends-on
> > 2. dts: Add depends-on
> > or
> > 1. dts: Add depends-on
> > 2. dt-bindings: Add mandatory depends-on
>
> And how does it matter? Anyway it goes separate trees.
I finally understand what you mean by separate trees.
And indeed, you're right, my patches split does not make
any sense.
According to feedbacks on this v3 series, these 3 patches
will be removed in v4.
Thanks for the review,
Hervé
--
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists