linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] linux/minmax.h: add non-atomic version of xchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:58:18 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] linux/minmax.h: add non-atomic version of xchg

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 08:56:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 04:48:39PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:

...

> > I hope there will be place for such tiny helper in kernel.
> > Quick cocci analyze shows there is probably few thousands places
> > where it could be used, of course I do not intend to do it :).
> > 
> > I was not sure where to put this macro, I hope near swap definition
> > is the most suitable place.
> 
> Ah, swap() in this context is not the same. minmax.h hosts it because
> it's often related to the swap function in the sort-type algorithms.
> 
> > Moreover sorry if to/cc is not correct - get_maintainers.pl was
> > more confused than me, to who address this patch.
> 
> ...
> 
> >  include/linux/minmax.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 
> Does it really suit this header? I would expect something else.

> Maybe include/linux/non-atomic/xchg.h, dunno.

It may become a candidate to host io-64 non-atomic versions and other
non-atomic generic headers...

> Btw, have you looked if Ingo's gigantic series have done anything to cmpxchg.h
> and related headers? Maybe some ideas can be taken from there?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko