[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5OFAfYA9sNr3m6Q@monkey>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:57:05 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() thread-safe
for pmd unshare
On 12/09/22 12:00, Peter Xu wrote:
> Based on latest mm-unstable (dbccafc6e992).
>
> This can be seen as a follow-up series to Mike's recent hugetlb vma lock
> series for pmd unsharing, but majorly covering safe use of huge_pte_offset.
>
> Changelog for v2->v3:
> - Added a-bs and r-bs
> - In walk_hugetlb_range() hooks, don't release vma lock for cond_resched()
Thanks for your continued work on this Peter!
As a followup to that discussion about releasing vma lock for cond_resched(),
I do not have a strong opinion. Glad you kept my r-b.
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists