[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbe8baf3-45b5-e843-2dcd-e7f0de035066@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 11:58:50 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] mm/hugetlb: Make walk_hugetlb_range() safe to pmd
unshare
On 12/9/22 09:00, Peter Xu wrote:
> Since walk_hugetlb_range() walks the pgtable, it needs the vma lock
> to make sure the pgtable page will not be freed concurrently.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/pagewalk.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> mm/hmm.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> mm/pagewalk.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pagewalk.h b/include/linux/pagewalk.h
> index 959f52e5867d..27a6df448ee5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pagewalk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pagewalk.h
> @@ -21,7 +21,16 @@ struct mm_walk;
> * depth is -1 if not known, 0:PGD, 1:P4D, 2:PUD, 3:PMD.
> * Any folded depths (where PTRS_PER_P?D is equal to 1)
> * are skipped.
> - * @hugetlb_entry: if set, called for each hugetlb entry
> + * @hugetlb_entry: if set, called for each hugetlb entry. This hook
> + * function is called with the vma lock held, in order to
> + * protect against a concurrent freeing of the pte_t* or
> + * the ptl. In some cases, the hook function needs to drop
> + * and retake the vma lock in order to avoid deadlocks
> + * while calling other functions. In such cases the hook
> + * function must either refrain from accessing the pte or
> + * ptl after dropping the vma lock, or else revalidate
> + * those items after re-acquiring the vma lock and before
> + * accessing them.
> * @test_walk: caller specific callback function to determine whether
> * we walk over the current vma or not. Returning 0 means
> * "do page table walk over the current vma", returning
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 3850fb625dda..796de6866089 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -493,8 +493,21 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
> required_fault =
> hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, pfn_req_flags, cpu_flags);
> if (required_fault) {
> + int ret;
> +
> spin_unlock(ptl);
> - return hmm_vma_fault(addr, end, required_fault, walk);
> + hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(vma);
> + /*
> + * Avoid deadlock: drop the vma lock before calling
> + * hmm_vma_fault(), which will itself potentially take and
> + * drop the vma lock. This is also correct from a
> + * protection point of view, because there is no further
> + * use here of either pte or ptl after dropping the vma
> + * lock.
> + */
> + ret = hmm_vma_fault(addr, end, required_fault, walk);
> + hugetlb_vma_lock_read(vma);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> pfn = pte_pfn(entry) + ((start & ~hmask) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index 7f1c9b274906..d98564a7be57 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ static int walk_hugetlb_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> const struct mm_walk_ops *ops = walk->ops;
> int err = 0;
>
> + hugetlb_vma_lock_read(vma);
> do {
> next = hugetlb_entry_end(h, addr, end);
> pte = huge_pte_offset(walk->mm, addr & hmask, sz);
> @@ -314,6 +315,7 @@ static int walk_hugetlb_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> if (err)
> break;
> } while (addr = next, addr != end);
> + hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(vma);
>
> return err;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists