[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5crEpr5QWptjK17@bfoster>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:22:26 -0500
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cachestat: implement cachestat syscall
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:51:32PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:51:39AM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
>
> > + if (!access_ok(cstat, sizeof(struct cachestat)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
>
> What for? You are using copy_to_user() later, right?
>
> > + f = fdget(fd);
> > + if (f.file) {
>
> It would be easier to read if you inverted the condition here.
>
Seconded.. I mentioned the same the last time I looked at this. On
looking again, perhaps it might even make sense to create a
filemap_cachestat() to split up the syscall bits from the associated map
walking bits..? That subsequently raises the question of whether a new
.c file is really necessary..
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists