lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:29:35 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] irqdomain: Switch to per-domain locking

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:14:34PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09 2022 at 15:01, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > The IRQ domain structures are currently protected by the global
> > irq_domain_mutex. Switch to using more fine-grained per-domain locking,
> > which may potentially speed up parallel probing somewhat.
> >
> > Note that the domain lock of the root domain (innermost domain) must be
> > used for hierarchical domains. For non-hierarchical domain (as for root
> > domains), the new root pointer is set to the domain itself so that
> > domain->root->mutex can be used in shared code paths.
> >
> > Also note that hierarchical domains should be constructed using
> > irq_domain_create_hierarchy() (or irq_domain_add_hierarchy()) to avoid
> > poking at irqdomain internals.
> 
> While I agree in principle, this change really makes me nervous.
> 
> Any fail in setting up domain->root correctly, e.g. by not using
> irq_domain_create_hierarchy(), cannot be detected and creates nasty to
> debug race conditions.
> 
> So we need some debug mechanism which allows to validate that
> domain->root is set up correctly when domain->parent != NULL.

Lockdep will catch that due to the

	lockdep_assert_held(&domain->root->mutex);

I added to irq_domain_set_mapping() and which is is called for each
(inner) domain in a hierarchy when allocating an IRQ.

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ