[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221213221227.56560374@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 22:12:27 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Fix cpumask() example typo
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
The sample code for using cpumask used the wrong field for the
__get_cpumask() helper. It used "cpus" which is the bitmask (but would
still give a proper example) instead of the "cpum" that was there to be
used.
Although it produces the same output, fix it, because it's an example and
is confusing in how to properly use the cpumask() macro.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
index fb4548a44153..1c6b843b8c4e 100644
--- a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
+++ b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(foo_bar,
__print_array(__get_dynamic_array(list),
__get_dynamic_array_len(list) / sizeof(int),
sizeof(int)),
- __get_str(str), __get_bitmask(cpus), __get_cpumask(cpus),
+ __get_str(str), __get_bitmask(cpus), __get_cpumask(cpum),
__get_str(vstr))
);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists