[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff5f1e9d-1f44-5a3b-4b76-d3cfa877b18b@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:27:32 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: deliver the accumulated 'issued' to
__issue_discard_cmd_orderly() to meet the max_requests limit
On 2022/12/13 17:34, Yuwei Guan wrote:
> Any of the following scenarios will send more than the number of
> max_requests at a time, which will not meet the design of the
> max_requests limit.
>
> - Set max_ordered_discard larger than discard_granularity from userspace.
> - It is a small size device, discard_granularity can be tuned to 1 in
> f2fs_tuning_parameters().
>
> We need to deliver the accumulated @issued to __issue_discard_cmd_orderly()
> to meet the max_requests limit.
>
> BTW, convert the parameter type of @issued in __submit_discard_cmd().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com>
> Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
For the code part, it looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Thanks,
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index a9099a754dd2..5268938466f5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1097,8 +1097,7 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> /* this function is copied from blkdev_issue_discard from block/blk-lib.c */
> static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
> - struct discard_cmd *dc,
> - unsigned int *issued)
> + struct discard_cmd *dc, int *issued)
> {
> struct block_device *bdev = dc->bdev;
> unsigned int max_discard_blocks =
> @@ -1379,8 +1378,8 @@ static void __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> mutex_unlock(&SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->cmd_lock);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> - struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
> +static void __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> + struct discard_policy *dpolicy, int *issued)
> {
> struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL;
> @@ -1388,7 +1387,6 @@ static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct discard_cmd *dc;
> struct blk_plug plug;
> unsigned int pos = dcc->next_pos;
> - unsigned int issued = 0;
> bool io_interrupted = false;
>
> mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> @@ -1415,9 +1413,9 @@ static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> }
>
> dcc->next_pos = dc->lstart + dc->len;
> - err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> + err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, issued);
>
> - if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> + if (*issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> break;
> next:
> node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
> @@ -1433,10 +1431,8 @@ static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
> mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
>
> - if (!issued && io_interrupted)
> - issued = -1;
> -
> - return issued;
> + if (!(*issued) && io_interrupted)
> + *issued = -1;
> }
> static unsigned int __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct discard_policy *dpolicy);
> @@ -1464,8 +1460,10 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> if (i + 1 < dpolicy->granularity)
> break;
>
> - if (i + 1 < dcc->max_ordered_discard && dpolicy->ordered)
> - return __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(sbi, dpolicy);
> + if (i + 1 < dcc->max_ordered_discard && dpolicy->ordered) {
> + __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(sbi, dpolicy, &issued);
> + return issued;
> + }
>
> pend_list = &dcc->pend_list[i];
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists