[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e377b58f396741fe980556a25326a201@zeekrlife.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:28:36 +0000
From: 管玉伟(竹官) <Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
"jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] f2fs: deliver the accumulated 'issued' to
__issue_discard_cmd_orderly() to meet the max_requests limit
>
>
> On 2022/12/13 17:34, Yuwei Guan wrote:
> > Any of the following scenarios will send more than the number of
> > max_requests at a time, which will not meet the design of the
> > max_requests limit.
> >
> > - Set max_ordered_discard larger than discard_granularity from userspace.
> > - It is a small size device, discard_granularity can be tuned to 1 in
> > f2fs_tuning_parameters().
> >
> > We need to deliver the accumulated @issued to
> > __issue_discard_cmd_orderly() to meet the max_requests limit.
> >
> > BTW, convert the parameter type of @issued in __submit_discard_cmd().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com>
> > Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
>
> For the code part, it looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
>
Hi Jeageuk,
Could you help to review this commit.
Thanks.
> Thanks,
>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index
> > a9099a754dd2..5268938466f5 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1097,8 +1097,7 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > /* this function is copied from blkdev_issue_discard from block/blk-lib.c
> */
> > static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
> > - struct discard_cmd *dc,
> > - unsigned int *issued)
> > + struct discard_cmd *dc,
> > + int *issued)
> > {
> > struct block_device *bdev = dc->bdev;
> > unsigned int max_discard_blocks = @@ -1379,8 +1378,8 @@ static
> > void __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > mutex_unlock(&SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->cmd_lock);
> > }
> >
> > -static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > - struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
> > +static void __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > + struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
> > +int *issued)
> > {
> > struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> > struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL; @@ -1388,7
> > +1387,6 @@ static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > struct discard_cmd *dc;
> > struct blk_plug plug;
> > unsigned int pos = dcc->next_pos;
> > - unsigned int issued = 0;
> > bool io_interrupted = false;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > @@ -1415,9 +1413,9 @@ static unsigned int
> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > }
> >
> > dcc->next_pos = dc->lstart + dc->len;
> > - err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> > + err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, issued);
> >
> > - if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> > + if (*issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> > break;
> > next:
> > node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node); @@ -1433,10 +1431,8 @@
> > static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info
> > *sbi,
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> >
> > - if (!issued && io_interrupted)
> > - issued = -1;
> > -
> > - return issued;
> > + if (!(*issued) && io_interrupted)
> > + *issued = -1;
> > }
> > static unsigned int __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > struct discard_policy *dpolicy);
> > @@ -1464,8 +1460,10 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > if (i + 1 < dpolicy->granularity)
> > break;
> >
> > - if (i + 1 < dcc->max_ordered_discard && dpolicy->ordered)
> > - return __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(sbi, dpolicy);
> > + if (i + 1 < dcc->max_ordered_discard && dpolicy->ordered) {
> > + __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(sbi, dpolicy, &issued);
> > + return issued;
> > + }
> >
> > pend_list = &dcc->pend_list[i];
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists