[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJzde05ZWmXrxKE+B8_YHd1nEzHpFfodSdGbS6jVOCqKAj-fxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:45:48 -0600
From: Allen Webb <allenwebb@...gle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] imx: Fix typo
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:32 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:26:06AM -0600, Allen Webb wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:23 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 02:46:09PM -0600, Allen Webb wrote:
> > > > A one character difference in the name supplied to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > > > breaks a future patch set, so fix the typo.
> > >
> > > What behaviour is broken here for older kernels? What would not work
> > > that makes this patch worthy of consideration for stable? The commit
> > > log should be clear on that.
> > >
> > > In the future, it may be useful for you to wait at least 1 week or so
> > > before sending a new series becuase just a couple of days is not enough
> > > if you are getting feedback.
> > >
> > > So before sending a v10, please give it at least a few days or a week.
> > >
> > > Luis
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:42 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 02:46:09PM -0600, Allen Webb wrote:
> > > > A one character difference in the name supplied to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > > > breaks a future patch set, so fix the typo.
> > >
> > > Breaking a future change is not worth a stable backport, right? Doesn't
> > > this fix a real issue now? If so, please explain that.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > I will update the commit message to say that it breaks compilation
> > when building imx8mp-blk-ctrl as a module (and so forth for the other
> > similar patches).
>
> Can that code be built as a module? Same for the other changes...
Nope, I will remove the cc: stable and revert the commit messages back
to just referencing the future change, but this time I will be more
specific.
SOC_IMX8M
symbol value 'm' invalid for SOC_IMX8M
ROCKCHIP_MBOX
symbol value 'm' invalid for ROCKCHIP_MBOX
STMPE_SPI
symbol value 'm' invalid for STMPE_SPI
Powered by blists - more mailing lists