linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y6Kx+iq9c5izbYRH@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2022 08:12:58 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:34:46AM -0300, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> 
> On 16/12/2022 08:24, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >
> > On 15.12.2022 20:04, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> >> Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
> >> the sm6125 platform.

> >> +			reg = <0x04807000 0x1c4>;
> >> +
> >> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> >> +
> >> +			clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux";
> >> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> >> +
> >> +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> >> +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
> >> +
> >> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> >> +			#size-cells = <1>;
> >> +			ranges;
> >> +
> >> +			status = "disabled";
> >> +
> >> +			ufs_mem_phy_lanes: lanes@...7400 {
> >> +				reg = <0x4807400 0x098>,
> >> +				      <0x4807600 0x130>,
> >> +				      <0x4807c00 0x16c>;
> >> +				#phy-cells = <0>;
> >> +			};
> > I believe this is deprecated. See [1].

> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221104092045.17410-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/T/#m988f3fe3d83b76bac247aea2d9dac34f37728d65

> I've looked into the documentation and this is only for the sc8280xp. 
> This PHY is defined as it is for the msm8996 and derivatives.

No, it's not just for sc8280xp. It's intended for all new bindings (i.e.
do not add more platforms to the msm8996 schema file).

Johan