lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:57:09 -0300
From:   Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>,
        Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

On 21/12/2022 04:12, Johan Hovold wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:34:46AM -0300, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>> On 16/12/2022 08:24, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 15.12.2022 20:04, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>>>> Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
>>>> the sm6125 platform.
>>>> +			reg = <0x04807000 0x1c4>;
>>>> +
>>>> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>>>> +
>>>> +			clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux";
>>>> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
>>>> +
>>>> +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
>>>> +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
>>>> +
>>>> +			#address-cells = <1>;
>>>> +			#size-cells = <1>;
>>>> +			ranges;
>>>> +
>>>> +			status = "disabled";
>>>> +
>>>> +			ufs_mem_phy_lanes: lanes@...7400 {
>>>> +				reg = <0x4807400 0x098>,
>>>> +				      <0x4807600 0x130>,
>>>> +				      <0x4807c00 0x16c>;
>>>> +				#phy-cells = <0>;
>>>> +			};
>>> I believe this is deprecated. See [1].
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221104092045.17410-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/T/#m988f3fe3d83b76bac247aea2d9dac34f37728d65
>> I've looked into the documentation and this is only for the sc8280xp.
>> This PHY is defined as it is for the msm8996 and derivatives.
> No, it's not just for sc8280xp. It's intended for all new bindings (i.e.
> do not add more platforms to the msm8996 schema file).
>
> Johan
Alright. But this would mean writing a new config for the sm6125 
specifically. If we're changing how the bindings for UFS PHYs work, 
wouldn't it make more sense to change the sm6115 config instead, since 
they're defined pretty much the same?

-- 
Lux Aliaga
https://nixgoat.me/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ