lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:15:06 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     ty <zonyitoo@...il.com>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, DHDAXCW <lasstp5011@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add EmbedFire LubanCat
 1

On 21/12/2022 13:12, ty wrote:
> Hi, Kozlowski and Stübner,
> 
> Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction.
> 
>> So how did you solve the comment "Does not look like properly ordered.
>> Don't add stuff at the end of files/lists."? What did you change to
>> solve it?
> 
>> for context sorting order in that file is alphabetical by description
> 
> I finally got it. It should be put right after the "Elgin RV1108 R1".
> 
>> You do not wrap at 75, but at some other place. Just put it to editor
>> and check where is wrapping (count characters).
> 
> The original message was:
> 
>>  from: DHDAXCW <lasstp5011@...il.com>
>>
>> LubanCat 1 is a Rockchip RK3566 SBC based
>> is developed by EmbedFire Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> Mini Linux Card Type Cheap Computer Development Board
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuteng Zhong <zonyitoo@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: DHDAXCW <lasstp5011@...il.com>
> 
> The longest line is "Mini Linux Card Type Cheap Computer Development
> Board", which has 53 characters. Or ... I should use the whole line as
> much as possible? Then I see why I was doing wrong. It will be fixed
> in the PATCH v5.

Yes,
because
such
commit
msg
is
also
within
75
characters
but
it
is
not
correct,
right?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ