linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve K3-am625-sk support (USB, MMC)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37fa237a-1115-e476-2a50-70a09d89d877@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2022 20:19:40 +0530
From:   "Raghavendra, Vignesh" <vigneshr@...com>
To:     Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@...labora.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC:     <martyn.welch@...labora.com>, Nitin Yadav <n-yadav@...com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve K3-am625-sk support (USB, MMC)

Hi Sjoerd

On 12/20/2022 6:11 PM, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> Hey Vignesh,
> 
> On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 17:02 +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16/12/22 8:06 pm, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
>>>
>>> This series picks up a few patches from the TI BSP tree that
>>> unfortunately didn't make it upstream thusfar.
> ...
>>> 0:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f714ee55-ef47-317d-81b9-57020dda064b@ti.com/T/
>>>
>>>
>> Really appreciate porting and posting these patches to mainline!
>> Wondering what tree are these patches based on?
>> I cannot apply cleanly on linux-next.
> 
> These are against Linux 6.1 ; I'll happy rebase agains next for the
> next round or is there a specific tree you prefer to base against?
> 

TI K3 patch queue is at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git ti-next

This is part of linux-next. So, yes, I would like all patches to be
based on -next or above tree.

I see you have already done that in v2.. Thanks!

Regards
Vignesh