[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f4f7bc4-c433-61b6-3fd8-6159f89e52ab@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 21:54:03 +0200
From: "Hawa, Hanna" <hhhawa@...zon.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <wsa@...nel.org>, <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, <benh@...zon.com>, <ronenk@...zon.com>,
<talel@...zon.com>, <jonnyc@...zon.com>, <hanochu@...zon.com>,
<farbere@...zon.com>, <itamark@...zon.com>,
Lareine Khawaly <lareine@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] i2c: designware: use casting of u64 in clock
multiplication to avoid overflow
On 12/21/2022 6:59 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Do you want this change in the same patch? i don't think it's related here..
>> I can push separated change
> Up to you. If you think it's not suitable, then don't change.
Will push as separated patch.
Thanks,
Hanna
Powered by blists - more mailing lists