linux-kernel - Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Add support for ADC nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:09:47 +0530
From:   Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>, <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Add support for
 ADC nodes


On 21/12/22 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/12/2022 06:42, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>> On 20/12/22 16:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/12/2022 11:12, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>>> J721s2 has two instances of 8 channel ADCs in MCU domain. Add DT nodes
>>>> for 8 channel ADCs for J721s2 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts    | 14 +++++++
>>>>    .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup.dtsi     | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>    2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>> index a7aa6cf08acd..67593aa69327 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>> @@ -309,3 +309,17 @@ &mcu_mcan1 {
>>>>    	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_pins_default>;
>>>>    	phys = <&transceiver2>;
>>>>    };
>>>> +
>>>> +&tscadc0 {
>>>> +	status = "okay";
>>>> +	adc {
>>>> +		ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>> +	};
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&tscadc1 {
>>>> +	status = "okay";
>>>> +	adc {
>>>> +		ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>> +	};
>>>> +};
>>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>
>>> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
>>> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
>>> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
>>> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>> Hi , I thought i did addressed the feedback since tscadc is just a
>> wrapper node.
>>
>> The actual adc node is inside of tscadc node.
> Read the feedback, from all emails.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Hi , i have gone through all earlier mails but can't find anything else. 
Can you point out again whats the issue.

Regards