linux-kernel - Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Add support for ADC nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:46:11 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        kristo@...nel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Add support for
 ADC nodes

On 22/12/2022 11:39, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
> 
> On 21/12/22 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/12/2022 06:42, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>> On 20/12/22 16:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/2022 11:12, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>>>> J721s2 has two instances of 8 channel ADCs in MCU domain. Add DT nodes
>>>>> for 8 channel ADCs for J721s2 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    .../dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts    | 14 +++++++
>>>>>    .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup.dtsi     | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>    2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>> index a7aa6cf08acd..67593aa69327 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>> @@ -309,3 +309,17 @@ &mcu_mcan1 {
>>>>>    	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_pins_default>;
>>>>>    	phys = <&transceiver2>;
>>>>>    };
>>>>> +
>>>>> +&tscadc0 {
>>>>> +	status = "okay";
>>>>> +	adc {
>>>>> +		ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>>> +	};
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +&tscadc1 {
>>>>> +	status = "okay";
>>>>> +	adc {
>>>>> +		ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>>> +	};
>>>>> +};
>>>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>>
>>>> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
>>>> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
>>>> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
>>>> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>> Hi , I thought i did addressed the feedback since tscadc is just a
>>> wrapper node.
>>>
>>> The actual adc node is inside of tscadc node.
>> Read the feedback, from all emails.
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> Hi , i have gone through all earlier mails but can't find anything else. 
> Can you point out again whats the issue.

"And this is a v2? Or resend? Or something else?"

You miss proper versioning and changelog.

Additionally - I commented just before error in your patch. You must fix
it, not ignore it, even though I did not point it out before.

Best regards,
Krzysztof