[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f89a1758-7cf5-3bb1-e28e-bb01fd6de9d3@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:23:15 +0530
From: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<kristo@...nel.org>, <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Add support for
ADC nodes
On 22/12/22 16:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/12/2022 11:39, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>> On 21/12/22 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 21/12/2022 06:42, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/22 16:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 20/12/2022 11:12, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>>>>> J721s2 has two instances of 8 channel ADCs in MCU domain. Add DT nodes
>>>>>> for 8 channel ADCs for J721s2 SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts | 14 +++++++
>>>>>> .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>>> index a7aa6cf08acd..67593aa69327 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>>> @@ -309,3 +309,17 @@ &mcu_mcan1 {
>>>>>> pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_pins_default>;
>>>>>> phys = <&transceiver2>;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +&tscadc0 {
>>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>>> + adc {
>>>>>> + ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +&tscadc1 {
>>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>>> + adc {
>>>>>> + ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
>>>>> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
>>>>> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
>>>>> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>> Hi , I thought i did addressed the feedback since tscadc is just a
>>>> wrapper node.
>>>>
>>>> The actual adc node is inside of tscadc node.
>>> Read the feedback, from all emails.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>> Hi , i have gone through all earlier mails but can't find anything else.
>> Can you point out again whats the issue.
> "And this is a v2? Or resend? Or something else?"
>
> You miss proper versioning and changelog.
>
> Additionally - I commented just before error in your patch. You must fix
> it, not ignore it, even though I did not point it out before.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Hi, i had replied to that as well earlier. You can check that out
https://lore.kernel.org/all/89ce3639-e979-e369-657a-20aea4295970@ti.com/ .
Maybe you missed out on that.
Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists