[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6RwAcXnfY/zjk/b@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:56:01 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: Mark label property as deprecated
On Thu 2022-12-22 15:01:44, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/22/22 14:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > This part I understand. What is not clear to me is, why is 'label' being
> > > > > un-deprecated.
> > > >
> > > > It shouldn't be. It seems to be Pavel's ad-hoc decision.
> > >
> > > Is there a majority agreement that the "label" property remains
> > > deprecated?
> >
> >
> > > If so, I would say we can mark the label as deprecated.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, the new generated standardized sysfs name does not seem
> > > to provide a full replacement for the "label" property.
> > > What is still missing?
> >
> > Having reasonable naming of the LEDs is pre-requisite for deprecating
> > label property.
>
> As far as I can tell, function and function-enumerator is the reasonable
> naming. Jacek seem to confirm that. I would say, label can be deprecated .
> What is the counter-argument for why it should NOT be deprecated ?
When the label is no longer neccessary for naming leds, it can be
deprecated. AFAICT, that is currently not the case.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists