linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: Mark label property as deprecated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb3c3a1e-ec10-1e7b-1b21-3cb250f92ecf@denx.de>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:21:49 +0100
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
        "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: Mark label property as deprecated

On 12/22/22 15:56, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2022-12-22 15:01:44, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 12/22/22 14:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>>>> This part I understand. What is not clear to me is, why is 'label' being
>>>>>> un-deprecated.
>>>>>
>>>>> It shouldn't be. It seems to be Pavel's ad-hoc decision.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a majority agreement that the "label" property remains
>>>> deprecated?
>>>
>>>
>>>> If so, I would say we can mark the label as deprecated.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, the new generated standardized sysfs name does not seem
>>>> to provide a full replacement for the "label" property.
>>>> What is still missing?
>>>
>>> Having reasonable naming of the LEDs is pre-requisite for deprecating
>>> label property.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, function and function-enumerator is the reasonable
>> naming. Jacek seem to confirm that. I would say, label can be deprecated .
>> What is the counter-argument for why it should NOT be deprecated ?
> 
> When the label is no longer neccessary for naming leds, it can be
> deprecated. AFAICT, that is currently not the case.

I'm sorry, this is not a counter-argument, this is hand-waving .

Do you have anything to back your claim that the label is currently 
still needed, contrary to what the DT bindings document claims for 
years? "This property is deprecated - use 'function' and 'color' 
properties instead. function-enumerator has no effect when this property 
is present."

"
commit c5d18dd6b64e09dd6984bda9bdd55160af537a8c
Date:   Sun Jun 9 20:19:04 2019 +0200

     dt-bindings: leds: Add properties for LED name construction

     Introduce dedicated properties for conveying information about
     LED function and color. Mark old "label" property as deprecated.

     Additionally function-enumerator property is being provided
     for the cases when neither function nor color can be used
     for LED differentiation.
"

It seems the function and function-enumerator is very much the 
replacement for label, except standardized. If that's not the case, do 
elaborate. If there is a special case that is not covered by it, do 
point it out.