[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6TL6ugDzZ89RBUY@x1n>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:28:10 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/hugetlb: uffd-wp fixes for
hugetlb_change_protection()
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:17:22PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 09:55:09PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Playing with virtio-mem and background snapshots (using uffd-wp) on
> > hugetlb in QEMU, I managed to trigger a VM_BUG_ON(). Looking into the
> > details, hugetlb_change_protection() seems to not handle uffd-wp correctly
> > in all cases.
> >
> > Patch #1 fixes my test case. I don't have reproducers for patch #2, as
> > it requires running into migration entries.
> >
> > I did not yet check in detail yet if !hugetlb code requires similar care.
Ah I should have left a message here but I forgot - afaict shmem is all fine.
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> > Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
> > Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> >
> > David Hildenbrand (2):
> > mm/hugetlb: fix PTE marker handling in hugetlb_change_protection()
> > mm/hugetlb: fix uffd-wp handling for migration entries in
> > hugetlb_change_protection()
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
>
> Thanks, David.
>
> --
> Peter Xu
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists