linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/17] pinctrl: intel: Introduce INTEL_COMMUNITY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y6tFMB5S23PgmxQd@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:19:12 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/17] pinctrl: intel: Introduce INTEL_COMMUNITY_*()
 to unify community macros

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 04:32:55PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Now it becomes visible that we can deduplicate SoC specific
> > *_COMMUNITY() macros across the Intel pin control drivers.
> > For that, introduce a common INTEL_COMMUNITY_GPPS() and
> > INTEL_COMMUNITY_SIZE() macros in the pinctrl-intel.h.
> 
> You should really start learning how to use --cover-letter option with
> git format-patch because for anything more than one patch pretty much
> requires such. Here I would really like to see how much lines this
> series ends up removing :)
> 
> The series looks good to me, though.

The series has been pushed to my review and testing branch, thanks!

P.S. I dared to convert the above into your Acked-by tag. Tell me if it must
not be the case.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko