lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 23:29:52 +0800
From:   Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        "Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] sched/fair: Introduce sched_smt_siblings_idle()

On 2022-12-23 at 21:28:50 -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:56:22PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > On 22/11/22 12:35, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > > Architectures that implement arch_asym_cpu_priority() may need to know the
> > > idle state of the SMT siblings of a CPU. The scheduler has this information
> > > and functionality. Expose it.
> > >
> > > Move the existing functionality outside of the NUMA code.
> > >
> > 
> > test_idle_cores() does something similar without an iteration, did you
> > consider using that instead?
> 
> IIUC, test_idle_cores() returns true if there is at least one idle core in
> the package. In my case, I need to know the idle state of only the SMT
> siblings of a specific CPU. Am I missing something?
>
I guess a similar one is select_idle_core(), but it also consider the CPU with
SCHED_IDLE task as idle. Is CPU with SCHED_IDLE task a candidate in your
scenario?

thanks,
Chenyu
> Thanks and BR,
> Ricardo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ