[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221224052850.GA8245@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:28:50 -0800
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] sched/fair: Introduce sched_smt_siblings_idle()
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:56:22PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 22/11/22 12:35, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Architectures that implement arch_asym_cpu_priority() may need to know the
> > idle state of the SMT siblings of a CPU. The scheduler has this information
> > and functionality. Expose it.
> >
> > Move the existing functionality outside of the NUMA code.
> >
>
> test_idle_cores() does something similar without an iteration, did you
> consider using that instead?
IIUC, test_idle_cores() returns true if there is at least one idle core in
the package. In my case, I need to know the idle state of only the SMT
siblings of a specific CPU. Am I missing something?
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists