linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 18/23] clk: mediatek: clk-mtk: Register MFG notifier in mtk_clk_simple

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221229082103.21064-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2022 16:21:03 +0800
From:   Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC:     <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>, <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <fparent@...libre.com>,
        <ikjn@...omium.org>, <johnson.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <jose.exposito89@...il.com>, <kernel@...labora.com>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, <msp@...libre.com>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
        <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>, <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <ryder.lee@...nel.org>,
        <sam.shih@...iatek.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>, <wenst@...omium.org>,
        <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>, <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/23] clk: mediatek: clk-mtk: Register MFG notifier in mtk_clk_simple_probe()

>In preparation for commonizing topckgen probe on various MediaTek SoCs
>clock drivers, add the ability to register the MFG MUX notifier in
>mtk_clk_simple_probe() by passing a custom notifier register function
>pointer, as this function will be slightly different across different
>SoCs.
>
>Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
>index b0a6225cd7b2..df6281492fb6 100644
>--- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
>+++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
>@@ -533,6 +533,14 @@ int mtk_clk_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 			goto unregister_composites;
> 	}
> 
>+	if (mcd->clk_notifier_func) {
>+		struct clk *mfg_mux = clk_data->hws[mcd->mfg_clk_idx]->clk;
>+
>+		r = mcd->clk_notifier_func(&pdev->dev, mfg_mux);
>+		if (r)
>+			goto unregister_clks;
>+	}

Should we have a IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check for clk_data->hws[mcd->mfg_clk_idx]?

thanks,
Miles
>+
> 	r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
> 	if (r)