[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y63fvNfPrnot+C6a@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 18:43:08 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
afd@...com, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,usb-vbus-regulator:
change node name
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 07:11:10PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> The patch was sent end of October, that is two months ago. I don't think two
> months of waiting is an unreasonable amount of time and is also more than "a
> couple of weeks"...
> And as far as I am aware there's no open review comments, which is why I did
> send the email to ask what the status is so that it can go into 6.3 and I can
> remove it from my inbox.
Please read the rest of the mail:
> > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > for the subsystem are normally handled.
I can't do anything with your content free ping on patch 2 of
some series...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists