linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,usb-vbus-regulator: change node name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5890061.lOV4Wx5bFT@g550jk>
Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2022 20:12:46 +0100
From:   Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        afd@...com, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,usb-vbus-regulator: change
 node name

On Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2022 19:43:08 CET Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 07:11:10PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > The patch was sent end of October, that is two months ago. I don't think
> > two months of waiting is an unreasonable amount of time and is also more
> > than "a couple of weeks"...
> > 
> > And as far as I am aware there's no open review comments, which is why I
> > did send the email to ask what the status is so that it can go into 6.3
> > and I can remove it from my inbox.
> 
> Please read the rest of the mail:
> > > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > > for the subsystem are normally handled.
> 
> I can't do anything with your content free ping on patch 2 of
> some series...

I'll just resend, that should alleviate all problems.