[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230102153458.zg3ku5styjcz2gf3@quack3>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:34:58 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: paolo.valente@...aro.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jack@...e.cz, hch@....de, damien.lemoal@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 05/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary
dereference to get async_bfqq
On Fri 23-12-22 03:16:36, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> The async_bfqq is assigned with bfqq->bic->bfqq[0], use it directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Yeah, that is a more logical choice. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index c3c4c83ee95f..ebcafe3c4c3b 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -4835,7 +4835,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
> icq_to_bic(async_bfqq->next_rq->elv.icq) == bfqq->bic &&
> bfq_serv_to_charge(async_bfqq->next_rq, async_bfqq) <=
> bfq_bfqq_budget_left(async_bfqq))
> - bfqq = bfqq->bic->bfqq[0];
> + bfqq = async_bfqq;
> else if (bfqq->waker_bfqq &&
> bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq->waker_bfqq) &&
> bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq &&
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists