[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2301020852500.2516029@rhweight-WRK1>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 08:54:48 -0800 (PST)
From: matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, hao.wu@...el.com, yilun.xu@...el.com,
russell.h.weight@...el.com, basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...el.com,
mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianfei.zhang@...el.com, corbet@....net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, macro@...am.me.uk,
johan@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
marpagan@...hat.com, bagasdotme@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] fpga: dfl: add basic support for DFHv1
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 08:18:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 12/28/22 10:16 AM, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> struct dfl_feature_info {
>>> u16 fid;
>>> u8 revision;
>>> + u8 dfh_version;
>>> struct resource mmio_res;
>>> void __iomem *ioaddr;
>>> struct list_head node;
>>> unsigned int irq_base;
>>> unsigned int nr_irqs;
>>> + unsigned int param_size;
>>> + u64 params[];
>> u64 *params
>
> This will break the overflow.h macros, no?
> Besides that it will break the code for sure as it's not an equivalent.
>
>>> };
I don't understand how this will break the overflow.h macros. The
definition of struct dfl_feature_info and all of its uses are in a single
file, dfl.c.
Matthew Gerlach
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists